YALC panel: Women in Fantasy at London Film and Comic Con
I attended my first Comic Con today and it was largely
because of this really exciting panel – on a topic that I have written about
before (my dissertation was on women in dystopia) and definitely will include
on this blog again. I was frantically taking these notes while listening so I
apologise if there are any inaccuracies – I have tried to summarise it the best
that I can and capture the heart of each answer. Some of the books and
characters mentioned I hadn’t heard about before so that was very exciting but
also means I haven’t joined the analysis so much this time – all that I’ve
written here is attempting to report what was being said. I will certainly
investigate them though and it’s exciting to learn about the characters that
have inspired others – there’s a whole world out there and always more to find
out! The panel was hosted by Liz De
Jaeger and included Samantha Shannon (The
Bone Season), Laure Eve (Fearsome
Dreamer; The Illusionists) and Zoë Marriott (Shadows on the Moon; and many others!) who were all awesome.
Both Zoë and Laure mention some Tamora Pierce characters – Alanna and Daine. Alanna is often
described as a tomboy who longs to be a knight rather than a ‘young lady’ while
Daine is a warrior and a mage (forgive me, I haven’t read these books). They
feature in The Immortals Quartet and The Song of the Lioness Quartet.
Laure
also mentions Lucy Pevensie from The Chronicles of Narnia because she
shows herself to be tenacious, having to insist at the beginning that she is
not insane and not making things up – Laure says she drives the story – unlike Susan.
But Susan is on Samantha’s list –
along with Hermione Granger and Arwen from Lord of the Rings. She likes the first two because they show it is
okay to be sensible and to be bossy while it was Arwen’s horse riding scene
with an ailing Frodo in the Fellowship of the Ring that stayed with her.
What constitutes a ‘strong
female character’?
Samantha challenges the term itself, arguing that ‘strong
female character’ has become a buzzword
– instead it should be more about ‘complexity’.
She acknowledges that there seem to be two main categories of female character
these days – they are either a Bella (Twilight) or a Katniss (The Hunger Games)
– but neither should be a blueprint. To make Katniss the definition of ‘strong
female character’ does her a disservice because it makes her ‘two dimensional’.
She’s more than a fierce-some warrior figure. She has vulnerabilities, moments
of passivity and allows herself to be moulded by those around her on many
occasions. Seeing Katniss as a great fighting hero completely ignores the intricacies of character and the subtle complexity in The Hunger Games - they're there, I've literally checked.
Laure backs up Samantha’s argument – female characters must
be complex and often their weaknesses are as important as their strengths. Being
physically strong and physically active is not the crucial factor and not what
women were necessarily asking for from ‘strong female characters’.
Zoë adds that in media the female characters that were
presented could have been replaced by a ‘lampshade’. In her eyes it is not
helpful to say that the two important traits are ‘strong’ and ‘female’ – too often
we have been presented with a ‘fighting
female sex toy’ (eg. ‘Halle Berry in Catwoman’ is one example).
So how do you
write/create these women?
‘By making them people’, Laure answers.
Samantha
argues for the importance of a compelling voice and a backstory – Paige from The Bone Season began simply as a voice
rather than a person.
Why are female
characters important specifically for fantasy and young adults?
Samantha’s response here is brilliant: ‘because we are still asking that question’ (originally Joss Whedon's quote). How often is that asked about male characters? Fantasy has been
traditionally masculine/male dominated so, Samantha believes there is a need
for visibility and representation – the ‘genre should mirror the world as it is’.
She also explains that while women writing in genres like crime and fantasy
sometimes adopt an androgynous name, she eventually decided that she would use
her own name to try to break down these boundaries.
Laure, on the other hand, says it is no longer necessary to
write female protagonists in YA, simply because there are so many already.
Rather than being hung up on gender, she wants to write good characters. They
all point out that YA fantasy is usually no different to adult fantasy and the
supposed ‘genre distinction’ is just a tag in a bookshop.
Zoë explains the common perception that YA is dominated by
female writers and female characters – but when you look more closely it is the
men who get more awards, more sales and more critical acclaim. There is still
not gender parity and people still think in terms of ‘boy books’ and ‘girl
books’.
What gender stereotyping
have you come across and really ‘gets your goat’?
It is often the case that the characters we love that become
stereotypes and safe options, Zoë states. Although men can write very good
female characters, even when reading the best authors she finds herself still
conscious of a ‘male gaze’ – you can
be empathising with a character and then the narrative will pull you back to show
you her body (particularly the private parts…).
Laure’s pet peeve is the ordinary girl suddenly gifted with
powers (and unaware of her attractiveness) who then encounters a hot boy who
explains it to her and then drives the plot.
The best female
characters in fiction?
Samantha immediately mentions Celaena Sardothien from Sarah
Maas’ Throne of Glass series – for
her extreme self-awareness and self-confidence. She also plugs a Swedish
fantasy trilogy about a set of vastly different and individual girls who
discover they are witches (the first book is called The Circle).
Alina Starkov from Leigh Bardugo’s Grisha trilogy gets Laure’s vote. She discovers she has an amazing
power… and a sexy man comes along… but they are both very complex.
Zoë recommends s N. K. Jemisin’s Inheritance Trilogy which she says is beautifully written and full
of character revelations and development.
Have you ever been
asked to tone something down for female characters?
Both Laure and Samantha say ‘no’ (Bloomsbury bought The Bone Season as an adult book).
Zoë, however, describes one instance where she was asked to
make a female character less competent (more useless) at fighting (and yet in Stormbreaker, fourteen year old Alex
Rider, was allowed to do whatever he wanted). She also references the divide
between High Fantasy (often medieval/imagined worlds/epic) and Urban Fantasy
(contemporary setting) – in the case of the latter editors put more onus on the
protagonist being likable and easier to empathise with.
Ultimately the important thing, Samantha adds, is to have
variety.
The panel then moved
on to audience questions, discussing their inspirations for becoming
authors, the strange and invisible fame that comes with it and the sensation of
power and magic you can have as an author. I found the whole session really
engaging and am very glad I made the effort to go. Although there is a long way
to gender parity, and still a lot to be desired in many of the female characters
we are presented with in film, TV and literature, it is an exciting time for
women in fantasy and reassuring to know there are writers like these out there –
a new and bold generation.
Thank you to all the organisers and participants including
Showmasters, YALC and Waterstones.
I would love to hear your own answers to these questions and
any opinions you may have on Women and Fantasy literature or literature in
general!
No comments:
Post a Comment